Home
Home • Forum • Rules • Register • Search • FAQ • Live RadioRadio • Log in
Post new topic Reply to topic Thank Post Page 1 of 1
Khalid Hasan And His Private View [Download Topic]
Author Message

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

 

Lahore: a musical story

 

 

 

 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View

 

 

riting is difficult work and writing about music is the most difficult of all, which is why we are in Saeed Malik’s debt for having produced a book that brings together Lahore’s musical history and heritage. Considering what it was and looking at what we are left with today, one can only feel a deep sense of loss.

The great musicians that Lahore once knew are either dead or they have left, and of those that have stayed, their voices are stilled. Ustad Fateh Ali Khan, the prince of Patialia school, rarely performs. Amanat Ali Khan’s son, who inherited some of the sweetness and light that was his father’s voice, frittered away his gift. Others from that house are simply not imbued with the genius that their elders had. Nazakat Ali Khan and Salamat Ali Khan are dead and their heirs can carry forward their musical legacy in name only.

Today, anyone who can get a couple of his friends together and raise the money to buy a guitar or two and a pair of drums becomes a music group. Almost none of them can sing or play. The sound they produce is a bastard sound, neither East nor West. Barring two, possibly three exceptions, the rest of the Pakistani “rock” groups are an embarrassment. That they get an audience is due not to the quality of their music but to the desperation with which the young seek entertainment in an entertainment-famished land that the Mullah is beginning to rule under the benevolent indifference of the state.

Saeed Malik’s Lahore: a musical companion, published thanks to the public-spirited munificence of Syed Babar Ali, sums up the city’s glorious musical past. He laments the departure of non-Muslim musicians in 1947 to India. Manto wrote Toba Tek Singh about the “partition” of the Lahore lunatic asylum. Someone should write about the “partition” of Lahore’s music. Those who went across included Pandit Jeevan Lal Mattoo, the two sisters, Surinder Kaur and Prakash Kaur, and film music composers Shyam Sunder, Amar Nath, Gobind Ram and Dhanni Ram, among others. The great Bade Ghulam Ali Khan and his son Munawwar Ali Khan left for India some years later, a cultural loss that is not possible to quantify, such was its immensity and so impoverished did it leave us.

But we were fortunate in gaining the arrival from India of Roshan Ara Begum, the lady who sang for the gods, though in the presence of mortals; Nazakat and Salamat Ali Khan; the great sarangi player Ustad Bundoo Khan; the scions of the Patiala gharana; Ustad Abdul Waheed Khan of Kairana – he died on a short visit to India – and from among folk singers, that most mellifluous of performers, Tufail Niazi. Khurshid Anwar, who put his unmistakable stamp on every composition he authored, stayed on in Bombay but returned to Lahore a few years into independence.

Saeed Malik recreates things that exist no longer, such as Lahore’s great baithaks and takiyas in the old city, which were the true nurseries of classical music. On Mohni Road, there stood a music school established in 1901 by Pandit Vishnu Digamber, which trained hundreds of serious students, some of whom like GA Farooq became quite famous. Haveli Mian Khan, built in Emperor Shahjehan’s reign, was a Lahore landmark but time wasn’t kind to it. It housed at different times such men as Ustad Kaley Khan, Ustad Eeday Khan and Ustad Bade Ghulam Ali Khan, whose grandfather worked at the court of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. According to Malik, “With the ill-planned horizontal expansion of Lahore, a large number of professional musicians had to shift to other places. No one can now find a practising musician living within or near the precincts of Haveli Mian Khan. The exodus of musicians from the Haveli has depleted the melodic resources of Lahore, affecting the music culture of the Walled City.” Another of Lahore’s depleted music centres was Katri Bawa, which after 1947 became home to the Rubabi clan of musicians.

Saeed Malik describes a Roshan Ara Begum performance in words that I could not agree with more, having heard her at the Open Air Theatre many times. He writes, “She was bestowed with the ability to command instant respect and appreciation from her audience. She did so by using long sweeps of notes, or applying meends , and swinging flights, which were supplemented by her emotion-charged voice. Her manner of voice production contained fullness as well as delicacy. . . She had an extraordinarily keen and subtle perception of sur , so much so that even the slightest lapse from the correct intonation of a note in the rendering of a raga would be seen reflected in a knowing look on her face.” The late Hayat Ahmed Khan would always recite this couplet before bringing on Malika-e-Mauseeqi, “Uss ghairat-e-naheed ki her taan hai Deepak: Shola sa lappak jaaye hai awaz tau dekho .” And she would take her place with a grace that could only be called queenly. I would often see Khurshid Shahid strumming the taanpura behind her, wearing a blazing orange Benarsi sari. Ustad Nathoo Khan would be on the sarangi and the incomparable Ustad Shaukat Hussain on the tabla. When something particularly subtle or difficult that her accompanists had executed pleased her, she would turn her face toward them for a fleeting moment and smile like an angel. She was dark and plain but a strange beauty would irradiate her being when she was performing. She was the queen of the Kalyan thaath and her Jhanjhoti thumri, a tribute to her great ustad Khan Sahib Abdul Karim Khan, was something to die for.

Saeed Malik also recalls perhaps the greatest ghazal singers of all times, Ustad Barkat Ali Khan, whose pupil Ghulam Ali has done him proud. “The adroitness and confidence with which Barkat Ali Khan used to render thumris, dadras and ghazals created a hypnotic spell on his audience . . . His renditions were interspersed with ornamentations. The flourish and ease with which he embellished his compositions with short melodic phrases, intervals, pauses, swings and suspended cadences served as a clear pointer to the command he had over the entire gamut of ghazal singing,” Malik writes. Mukhtar Begum, Agha Hashr’s lifelong love and the older sister of Farida Khanum, who performed the night President Ayub Khan came to the All Pakistan Music Conference, was a perfect singer. So superb was her rendition of both the word and the note that she left her listeners breathless. She would always sing one or more of Agha Hashr’s ghazals with a feeling that could only have sprung out of her love for and devotion to the man who was called “the Indian Shakespeare.”

Saeed Malik also writes about the great composers of film music associated with Lahore, men such as Ustad Jhandhey Khan, Rafiq Ghaznavi, Master Ghulam Haider (who gave the young Marathi girl called Lata her big break), Shyam Sunder and, of course, the one and only, Khurshid Anwar. Ustad Jhandey Khan, born in Jammu or one of its suburbs to a Brahmin family in 1895, is to be remembered for a musical feat never accomplished before or since. All twelve songs of Kedar Sharma’s pre-1947 classic Chitralekha were set to the raag Bhairvin. He composed music for about 30 movies, left Bombay after partition, came to Lahore, composed for two movies and then settled in Gujranwala where he spent the rest of his life in prayer. He is buried in that city that is associated with wrestlers and gangsters. Saeed Malik traced Ustad Jhandey Khan’s daughter in that town in 1982 but writes that “she did not wish to be identified” with her father considering the low esteem with which professional musicians are held in our society.

And that is our shame.

 (Friday Times)




Last edited by sur on 13 Apr 2007 01:07; edited 1 time in total





____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Thanks for the useful Topic sur :
taalsurtaal 

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

Dilip Kumar is king

 

 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View
 

 

            Dilip Kumar has one thing in common with Jesus Christ and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Like them he was born in December. This year he was eighty years old, a day he marked like any other, they say, though his friends and fans, spread as they are in all parts of the earth, flooded him with messages.

            Those of us who cut our teeth on Dilip Kumar can still be caught at an unguarded moment imitating one of his characteristic gestures. Lahore’s great portrait photographer, the late M. Bhatti who ran his studio imperially from the corner of the Mall and Beadon Road, was fond of telling a certain Dilip Kumar story. One day, a distracted young man walked into his studio and asked if he was M. Bhatti the photographer. He was, Bhatti told him. The young man, after some hesitation, pulled out a crumpled picture from his pocket, snipped out of a newspaper, and handed it to Bhatti who had been looking at him all this time with increasing amusement. Bhatti flattened the picture with his hand on the table behind which he sat, looked at it carefully and asked, “So?” “Bhatti sahib, meri bus bilkul aisi hi aik tasveer bana dai’n,” the young man said. Gently, Bhatti patted him on the cheek and answered,  “Barkhoodar, jis din tum meray paas Dilip Kumar wali shakal lai ke aao gai, uss din uss jaisi tasveer bhi banna doon ga.”

            In those days, such young men were to be found everywhere in India and Pakistan or wherever Dilip Kumar’s movies were shown. They all tried to play him in real life situations since youth is a time of illusion and make-believe. What they forgot was that their hero’s great romances were seldom to be replicated in real life. But what of that! They tried to speak in his hushed voice, a lock of hair dangling in a tiny curl on their foreheads; they lowered their eyes when they spoke to a girl, a happening more imagined than real; they memorised his great lines as they stood in front of a mirror trying to look like the tragic hero, most of whose movies ended on a death scene.

            A classmate of ours in college who had modeled himself on Dilip Kumar was known, but behind his back only, as Dilip Kumhar or Dilip the Potter. There must have been Dilip the Potters in every big and small city and town in India and Pakistan. Ah! how we knew his lines, delivered in his soft, well-modulated, shy, self-conscious voice. There is Dilip Kumar in the movie Shabnam, saying to Kamni Kaushal, once the Uma Kayshap of Kinnaird College, Lahore, who is dressed as a boy, “Tagore nai kaha tha: ‘Tumhari aankhain dau neeli jheelain hain aur mein unn meain doob, doob jana chahata hoon.” Whether Tagore ever spoke of eyes like blue lakes in which he wanted to drown and then drown again, we neither knew nor cared. I do know, however, of at least one love letter – though like most love letters of those days, it was never delivered - in which this line was reproduced without acknowledgment to the Seer of Shanti Naketan.

            Then there was the Dilip of Deedar who is slapped across the face by Ashok Kumar, the jealous husband of Nargis. Ashok says, “Ramu zindgi bari haseen hai.” “Doctor sahib,” answers Dilip, “Aap nain kabhi Mala kau ghaur se nahin dekha, wo zindigi se bhi zayada haseen hai.”

For Mala, read Nargis, that narcissus of undying bloom and indolent eyes. And who can forget the Dilip of Kedar Sharma’s Jogan, in love with that vestal virgin of Krishna, played to saintly perfection by Nargis? Or Dilip cast against the loveliest woman ever to appear on the Indian screen, the tragic beauty, Madhubala, a woman Dilip loved but could not marry because of the pigheadedness of her angry Pathan father Ataullah Khan, who dragged Dilip through the courts for years, charging him with the abduction of Mumtaz Begum, the daughter the world knew as Madhubala. The great love scenes between the two in Tarana are as moving today as they were all those years ago. One thinks of Dilip appearing against another woman he was in love with, Kamni Kaushal, who was already married. When their last film Arzoo was released, it was advertised as, “For the last time together.”

            Dilip made his first movie Jawar Bhata in 1946 and in quick succession Milan, but his first great success was Jugnu where he played against Nur Jehan who, unlike him, was shown as coming from a poor family and who dies of consumption. My friend Khwaja Mahmood

Anwar in Sialkot used to say that anybody who coughs more than once in a movie is not going to last long, tuberculosis being the disease most favoured by the industry. Some years ago, I presented a video of Jugnu to Jugnu (Mohsin), asking her to watch Dilip Kumar throw all those banknotes in his greedy father’s face and screaming, “Pitaji, aap kau daulat chayyhai?”

            I have always believed that Nawaz Sharif will not go to heaven because of the three hundred umras he has performed over the years –  in the last two especially – but because he had the courage, decency and imagination to welcome this great son of Peshawar and, by that measure, Pakistan, and pin one of the country’s highest honours on him.

            For myself, what I can wear as a medal is my being one of the panel that interviewed Dilip Kumar on PTV in 1998. However, PTV being PTV, I was horrified to discover that there was not one but six interviewers, plus the moderator Moeen Akhtar. I have seen a few disasters in my time, but that was easily the greatest. Moeen Akhtar did not let anyone talk, including the great star of the show. With Dilip in the middle, we formed a semi-circle around him. The opening was auspicious because the ever elegant Naveed Shehzad asked Dilip a very poetic question in her silvery voice. But since auspicious beginnings are to be distrusted, as they often end in the contrary direction, that exactly was what happened that evening as well. Moeen Akhtar hogged the show and asked not a single question that had the remotest bearing on Dilip’s work, his craft as an actor, his great leading ladies, the legendary directors like Mehbub and Bimal Roy he had worked under, or anything about what he read or liked. It was Moeen Akhtar all the way, and when you thought he was done, there was more of him, just yap, yap, yap.

            I suggested some days later that Dilip Kumar had earned another medal, this time for gallantry, because he had endured ninety minutes of the most excruciating chatter without complaining even once. I stand behind that proposal as we all wish this great man who has brought so much happiness to millions upon millions, many, many happy returns of the day.

 (Friday Times)






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

 

met Fayyaz Hashmi, the great poet and lyricist of the Indian-Pakistani cinema and entertainment industry only once and now regret that I made no attempt to meet him again. It was in Lahore in 1968 or thereabouts and it was at the offices of a company that supplied hydropower plants and components to Wapda. I used to drop in there off and on to see a couple of friends. That day, there he was, a dark thick-set man wearing dark glasses, sitting in a chair quietly drinking tea. What he was doing there I have no idea. “This is Fayyaz Hashmi,” my friend said. I registered nothing. We shook hands. My friend spoke again, “Yes, the Fayyaz Hashmi.” The penny dropped. There in front of me sat one of the all-time greats of the music industry with few, if any, equals. Pakistan did not treat him well, as it did not treat Saadat Hasan Manto or “Prince of Minerva Movietone” Sadiq Ali or Mumtaz Shanti or Rehana or Meena Shorey, the “ lara lappa” girl, well.

What follows about Hashmi and two others is based on the research work of movie encyclopedist extraordinaire, my friend Muhammad Rafiq of Southend-on-Sea in Essex, England.

Fayyaz Hashmi was born in Calcutta in 1920 and it is a shame that his name is never mentioned among those acknowledged to stand in the first rank, nor has the industry to which his contribution is immense, or the state which he chose to become a citizen of, recognised his work. He started life with the Gramophone Company of India and in 1947 on his insistence he was sent to organise the derelict music scene in Pakistan. Lahore, which was the third important EMI centre after Calcutta and Bombay, lay in ruins, so he began to bring together instrumentalists and vocalists of merit, some of whom had come from the other side of the great divide. To him goes the credit for the first recordings made in Lahore after the maelstrom of 1947 and he it was who brought to the fore Munawwar Sultana (not the actress), Farida Khanum and Zeenat Begum, among many others.

His father, a writer and director, worked for Madan Theatre and they lived in Hayat Khan Lane in Calcutta, next to Agha Hashr Kaashmiri, the “Indian Shakespeare”. Fayyaz imbibed the literary and artistic spirit at the gatherings that took place at their home which Agha Hashr attended regularly. At the age of 13 or 14, he wrote a ghazal that was very well received. Then Master Fida Hussain sang another of the boy wonder’s ghazals that also became a hit from one end of India to the other. ( Qadr kisi ki hum ne na jaani: Haa’i mohabbat haa’i jawani).

He was 20 when the Gramophone Company of India employed him as its resident lyricist. The music director of the company was the great Kamal Dasgupta with whom Fayyaz formed a long and memorable creative association. Fayyaz wrote the first song that Talat Mahmood sang in 1941 ( Sab din ek samaan nahin tha) and the runaway hit Tasveer teri dil mera behla na sakay gi. He also wrote the immortal Pankhij Malik song Ye raatain, ye mausam and the first Urdu/Hindi songs for Hemant Kumar, Juthika Roy, Feroza Begum and Jagmohan. In all, he wrote more than 500 non-film songs, each one of which defines a human situation poignantly, romantically. He also wrote lyrics for a large number of movies, both in India and Pakistan. The good news is that he is alive but I am not sure if he lives in Lahore, Karachi or elsewhere. There is time yet to honour him nationally.

The two other greats who remain all but forgotten are the sweet-voiced Bengali singer Feroza Begum, one of the great exponents of Nazrul Geeti. Born in Faridpur district, now in Bangladesh, she showed promise at an early age and was just eight when she won a place on the Children’s Corner programme of All India Radio, Calcutta. Her first record was cut by Columbia when she was barely 12. She received her early training from Chitta Roy who taught her a number of Nazrul Islam songs. She also began to explore other forms, including ghazal and light classical. She reached full flowering under the great Kamal Dasgupta who also set some of Nazrul’s poetry to music. Kamal Dasgupta was born in Jassore district in 1912 and started out with the Gramophone Company of India for which he made music history, writing compositions for such immortals as Pankaj Malik, Juthika Roy and Kanan Devi, Kalyani Das, Jagmohan and Hemant Kumar. His most memorable films as music director were Jawab ( Aye chand chhup na jana by Kanan Devi) and Hospital ( Meri majbooryoon nain mera daaman chaak kar dala by Kanan Devi). Fayyaz Hashmi wrote the lyrics.

Kamal Dasgupta felt ignored in the years after independence. He found it hard to accept the neglect he faced once his great work was done and then forgotten. He and Fayyaz Hashmi earned vast sums of money for the cinema and the record industry, not to mention the pleasure and happiness they brought to the viewing and listening millions, but as time passed, they were thrown on the slag heap and assigned to oblivion as if they had never existed. Forgotten stood the man who had written such undying tunes as the Kanan Devi hits Prabhoo ji, Prabhoo ji tum mano baat hamari, Yeh dunaya Toofan Mail, Ai chand chhup na jana, or Jagmohan’s O varsha ke pehle baadal or Kamla Jharya’s Na tum meray, na dil mera, na jaan-e-na’tawaan meri. He was a man of few words. A faint smile from him meant that the artist’s rendition had pleased him. Juthiki Roy waited all her life to hear a word of praise from him.

Kamal Dasgupta left Calcutta sometime in the 1960s and came to Dhaka where he converted to Islam, taking the name Kamal Islam, before marrying Feroza Begum whom he must have always loved. He did not work or he wrote no music. They had three children. He died in Dhaka in 1974, unsung and unremembered. Feroza Begum, who was younger, lives in Dhaka. In 1971, in a letter to a friend, Kamal Dasgupta wrote in Bengali, “The pictures you see in front, everybody remembers them and praises them. But nobody wants to know the people who work behind the scenes, nor talk about them. That is the nature of the world.”

 (Friday Times)






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

Iqbal: one in a million

 

 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

 

            Perhaps it is the fate of great men to become the subject of unsubstantiated stories which, more often than not,  emanate from those who, in the words of Dr M.D. Taseer, are more keen “to gain immortality” than place facts on record. Such attempts do not necessarily wait for a decent period of time either; they can start as soon as the great man is gone. Allama Muhammad Iqbal has been no exception.

            Only one year after his death in 1938, so records his nephew Ijaz Ahmed in his 1985 biography, a Lahore Urdu newspaper and a weekly published articles about Iqbal’s childhood, based on, what they claimed, were the recollections of his “childhood playmate”. This “playmate” had also supplied the papers with a photograph which ran under the caption ‘Iqbal in the lap of his father’. The picture showed two children, no more than two and a half, one sitting to the left and identified as Iqbal, and the other as his “cousin”, more specifically, his uncle’s son. The man in the middle was clearly in his early sixties. A moment’s reflection would have shown that if this indeed was Iqbal’s father (as he was), then at the time the picture was taken, Iqbal could not have been two and a half. The two children, actually, were Ijaz, son of Sheikh Ata Mohammad, Iqbal’s elder brother, and Ijaz’s cousin Aftab, Iqbal’s eldest son. This photograph continues to appear off an on in special ‘Iqbal Numbers’ brought out on his birthday. It was, therefore, apt that Ijaz called his biography Mazloom Iqbal.

            Once, records Ijaz, Iqbal was told about a new commentary of the Quran being done by someone not particularly known for his adherence to Islam. Iqbal, always a man of few words, smiled and said, “There was a time when it was Hussain who was the mazloom. Today, it is the Quran.” Then he recited a verse from the holy book and added, “Let’s see what he does with this one.” Little did he know that after his death, he would become another mazloom with “friends” galore and stories bearing no relation to truth. Faiz Ahmed Faiz once said, “In our time, there is no poet who is more mazloom than Iqbal. Every critic and commentator has tried to make him conform to his own views, ideas and beliefs. These gentlemen are always ready with a verse or quote from Iqbal’s writings to prove their point.”

            The adoption of Iqbal by state institutions, though well motivated, has practically ensured that he be feared more than read. Radio Pakistan, official organs of information, literary heavyweights, political orators and state academies have collectively managed to put Iqbal, not within, but outside the reach of the common reader. The younger generation, which Iqbal hoped would instruct the old, knows little about him or what he wrote and even less about the kind of man he was. The young see him as a colossus who is best viewed from a distance. By projecting him as an unsmiling philosopher and an austere theologian, these institutions have done great disservice to both Iqbal the poet and Iqbal the human being.  There are few poets more readable than Iqbal, especially the Iqbal of Bang-e-Dara.

It is painful, despite the distance of years, to think that though Iqbal earned barely enough, yet all his life, he continued to help several members of the family who had no one else to turn to. He never wanted his poetry to be a means of earning money because he believed it to be God’s gift and not a result of his own efforts. However, so limited remained his income, dependent entirely on his legal practice, that he felt obliged to allow himself some earnings from his books, though they were always negligible. His heart was not in his legal work, nor was he temperamentally equipped to follow any of the techniques that turn lawyers into money-minting machines.  He would have been happy  to be appointed to the Lahore High Court but was denied the position because of the Chief Justice, Sir Shadi Lal, who said, “I know Iqbal as a poet, not a lawyer.” Iqbal also hoped that one of the princely Muslim states, especially Hyderabad, would grant him an annuity or stipend that would free him from day-to-day financial worries and give him time to write and reflect.

Tragically, that was not to be. He made a trip to Hyderabad in 1910 with this in view but returned in some disappointment. What would it have mattered to the richest ruler in the world to set aside a minuscule sum for the greatest poet and seer of his age! In 1932, the Nawab of Bhopal wrote a personal letter to the Nizam of Hydrabad asking that the State pay a monthly stipend of Rs 1,000 to Iqbal so that he could concentrate on his literary work. The proposal was examined by one of the Nizam’s ministers who wrote, “That Sir Muhammad Iqbal is a good poet is a matter about which those well versed in the art of poetry disagree. Assuming that he indeed is a good poet, it is still not ground enough to grant him a monthly stipend of Rs. 1,000. Why does the Nawab Sahib of Bhopal who recommends his case, not pay him this stipend himself? In principle, Hyderabad funds should not leave the State, unless there is a real need for this to happen.”  Iqbal, obviously, was “no real need”.

Iqbal began legal practice in 1908 and earned only between Rs 20,000 and Rs 25,000 in the next ten years. In a letter to his father he writes, “I have so far not been able to rent a nice house, nor buy proper furniture, nor acquire a horse and carriage.” In 1916, much as he wanted to escape the heat of Lahore in the summer and spend a few days in the hills, he did not have the money to do so. He waited years to buy a car and when he did, it was a used one which spent more time in the repair shop than on the road. Iqbal’s will, written in 1935, lists his possessions. His books are willed to the Islamia College, Lahore, his clothes for distribution among the poor, which leaves two carpets, one cotton broadloom, one sofa set, some chairs and a bit of money kept in the bank in the names of his two minor children. That was all.

Iqbal detested Mullahism and considered it a “disgrace to Islam”. However, the Mullahs got their revenge when taking advantage of a statement Iqbal had made favouring Sultan Ibne Saud, the Khatib of Lahore’s Wazir Khan mosque, one Syed Deedar Ali Shah, issued a fatwa declaring Iqbal an infidel because of some of his verses. He also said that any Muslim who interacted with Iqbal would be in a state of grave sin.”

Today, no one remembers Syed Deeder Ali Shah, but the “infidel’s” name shines in glorious splendour.

 (Friday Times)






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

Sultan Rahi lives

 

 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

 

            One can’t say about others, but the Referendum has been great news for lovers of the Punjabi cinema. The gap created by the sad and sudden departure of Sultan Rahi a few years ago, a gap that nobody thought could ever be filled, has been more than filled. The stirring performance by Lt. Gen. Khalid Maqbul, Governor of the loyal and gallant province of Punjab, at Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s dramatic one-day opener at Minar-e-Pakistan brought back memories of that great hero who vanquished every villain who ever crossed his path or cast a lascivious eye on the female lead, otherwise known as “pind di izzat” or the honour of the village.

            The Governor was ably assisted by the Great Auctioneer Tariq Aziz (not to be confused with the President’s secretary) who had earlier gone into history books as the man who smashed his way into the Supreme Court of Pakistan and made their exalted lordships flee for their lives. I was shocked when at the instance of this government, Tariq Aziz was tried and punished. Is that how an act of valour should be rewarded? Should the man who led the Goons of Gwalmandi in glorious  battle against Pakistan’s higher judiciary not have been given a campaign award? One very much hopes Tariq’s great feat will receive the state recognition it deserves. Can there be a reason for not declaring him the colonel general of the supply corps, for instance?

            There can be no two opinions that it was Tariq Aziz who put the ongoing Pervez Musharraf Show on the road. One deplores the attempt by some journalists to embarrass Tariq by making snide remarks the other day at the President’s press conference, attended by invitation of the Ministry of Information by every newspaper whose name we have never heard. It must have been heart-warming for the President to be congratulated more than questioned. That is the way not only journalists but all citizens should in future behave. There is no place for cynicism in this country. In fact, someone should urge Gen. Moinuddin Haider to issue an ordinance declaring cynicism an offence just short of treason, punishable by, among other things, a weeklong stint in the cabinet with that Eternal Bride of Deviant Rule, Dr Attiya Inayatullah, who was also wrecker-in-chief of the family planning programme during the Zia-ul-Haq years.

            Meanwhile, the fancy dress show featuring the President continues to draw crowds in city after city. It is entirely untrue that anyone has to be carried to these meetings. Newspapers ought to express regrets for printing wholly fictitious stories about police confiscating anything that moves on the road. Those who go to the President’s meetings do so entirely of their own accord and out of their profound love for their leader. Were these crowds rented, as some brutal allegations have it, would they be cheering the way they do? After all, it is well known that you can take a horse to water but you can’t make him drink. And those who go to the President’s meetings are not horses but men, or so they appear to be on Pakistan television which, we all know, is entirely objective when it comes to coverage of officially sponsored events.

            What we are witnessing these days is revolutionary in many respects. It is little realised that the General may have ushered in a new era of headdress fashion in Pakistan. The splendid turbans, not seen since the last of the Ottoman kings was in the throne, that the President has been seen wearing have been nothing short of a profound fashion statement. The couturiers of Paris, Milan, Tokyo, London and New York have surely taken note of this phenomenon and there is no question that their fall and winter collections for both men’s and women’ fashions will reflect what we have been watching night after night and day after day on our screens. What appears to have caught the people’s fancy is the head adornment chosen by the President while wearing his crack commando uniform. I am disappointed that his recent appearances at public meetings have featured civvies. Obviously, he has been misadvised. There is nothing more fetching than the uniform-turban combination. Could there be a better marriage between tradition and martial gallantry?

            I have also noticed that the President of late has been trying to express himself entirely in Urdu. Those who advised him to do so are no friends of his and, if they are officials, they should be fired, or if not fired, sent out as ambassadors, unless they are allotted a brief stay at the great fort of Attock where they would at least be able to play Chinese checkers with Asif Ali Zardari in the afternoons. I am assuming A to Z is at Attock. Who knows where he has been sent after the venerable Nawabzada Nasrullah Khan described him as a hostage.

            The President should also revert to the mixed language drink he offered us in his marathon television address. It was a tremendous experience. When you thought he was speaking English, he would throw in a string of Urdu phrases, and when you thought he was speaking Urdu, he would slip into English. Does anyone realise how much good that speech did to the young students trying to improve their English vocabulary! For instance, none of them knew until the President spoke from those dozens of paper slips, what the word ‘tertiary’ meant. Now they all do. The language in which the President spoke that day is the language of the future, neither English nor Urdu. That is the direction in which things are moving and that is where he is trying to take us. Those who say they are glad Maulvi Abdul Haq was not alive to hear that speech are old fuddy duddies who are utterly irrelevant.

            As for the Referendum, it is a foregone conclusion, so massively popular the President is. I was for several heart-warming days in Islamabad and was thrilled to find every standing pole and tree hung with soul-stirring messages from Dr Muhammad Amjad and Syed Kabir Ali Wasti asking the nation to vote for President Musharraf in the Referendum. Dr Amjad, of whom I had not heard before, I confess, is the president of the Pakistan Poultry Association. Is it realised that he can make every rooster all over Pakistan crow from the time the polls open on April 30 to the time they close. If that happens, no matter how much Nawabzada Nasrullah Khan screams, no one will be able to hear him.

            As for Syed Kabir Ali Wasti, he is my choice as Prime Minister because when he invites you to dinner, he passes out choice Havana cigars at the end of the evening. As for himself, he neither smokes nor drinks, which should make him acceptable to the bearded ones.

 (Friday Times)






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

Memories of pre-1947 Lahore

 

 

 
Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

 
 
 

“Everything about Lahore was special. If you wanted to see the best-dressed young men in India, they were to be found in Lahore. The best food in India was to be found in Lahore. It was a city of gourmets and it had romance. A popular film song of those days went: ‘Ik shehr ki laundia, nainoon ke teer chala gayee’”

 

ran Nevile says though he left Lahore fifty-five years ago, that’s where his heart has always remained. “In a way, you can say, I never left Lahore because it is always with me. I have carried it with me wherever I have gone, and when I look back and there is no place on earth I haven’t been and all through those years, Lahore has stayed with me. I am an unreconstructed Lahoria, you can say, who never thought he would ever live elsewhere.”

I first “met” Pran Nevile at Vanguard Books in Lahore. That was where I picked up his book, first published in 1993. He had called it, “Lahore, a sentimental journey”. I was fascinated by his recreation of Lahore as it was in the thirties and forties; and although I had never seen the city then, I have had a lifelong nostalgia about it. That is the Lahore I would have liked to live in, and if not that, then, once again, in the Lahore of the sixties, the city the uncrowned king of whose streets was the great Sardar Muhammad Sadiq, who now lies in Bibi Pakdaman’s little acre off Empress Road.

My subsequent contact with Pran was maintained through his childhood friend Saeed Ahmed Khan, whom I never met but with whom I began to correspond when he sent me a piece Pran had written in an Indian newspaper. These two friends were inseparable before independence and retained the same affection for each other and longed to meet again as the years passed. Saeed Ahmed Khan, from one of Jullandhur’s Pathan bastis, had come to Lahore for his schooling. He and Pran were in Government College together. Saeed Ahmed Khan, I report with regret, passed on some years ago, but not before he and Pran had a tearful reunion in Lahore.

This is how Pran described it to me when I met him for the first time in a Washington suburb in the first week of December. He had come from Delhi and he was staying with another old friend from his Lahore days. “It was the most emotional meeting of my life. We had met after more than fifty years and both of us broke down. It all came back in that one magic moment. It was as if we had never been separated.”

I asked Pran what he meant when he wrote that Lahore did not have a “composite culture”. What it had could not be given a name, but it was a culture all its own, something wholesome and vital, something that lay in perfect harmony within and without. “This term composite culture,” he said in his rich and pure Lahori Punjabi that fifty-five years of exile from the city have not altered or affected, “is a term invented by the new intellectual elite. These new fangled terms, enough of which we hear in India also, are beyond me.”

“Why was Lahore called the gem of India?” I asked. “That it indeed was,” Pran replied, “It was totally different from the rest of India, in every way. It was the educational centre of North India. It had more colleges than any other city of India. The student population of Lahore was lively and wonderful. Co-education came late, but there it was. Lahore was always very prosperous; it was the hub of North India right up to Peshawar. Everything about Lahore was special. If you wanted to see the best-dressed young men in India, they were to be found in Lahore. The best food in India was to be found in Lahore. It was a city of gourmets and it had romance. A popular film song of those days went: Ik shehr ki laundia, nainoon ke teer chala gayee.And this doggerel that we all knew and I to this day remember: Tibbi mein phir ke jalwa-e-Parwardigar dekh: Hai dekhney ki cheez issay baar baar dekh.The great stars, the great movers and shakers of the Bombay movie world were all from Lahore.”

Pran’s father, a government servant, opted for Pakistan. “He used to say, as did everybody, ‘All this is going to pass, this Hindu-Muslim rioting.’ We never could imagine that people would have to move across in such massive numbers, never to see their homes again, never to meet their friends again. My father was advised to take some leave, stay away from the city and in a few weeks, all would be well when he could return. That was never to be.” Pran reminisced about Lahore’s old and now vanished Mall restaurants: Lorang’s, Stiffles, Volga, Elphinstone, Metro, the last one, he said, was the gathering place of movie stars. “It was a very classy place,” he recalled, a distant look in his eyes.

Pran said the best ‘mithai’ shop in Lahore was run by Umrao Singh outside Lohari Gate. At the other end of Anarkali that turns into Ganpat Road was the popular ‘lassi’ outlet of Bhagwan Das. Close to it was another famous ‘mithai’ place called Kundan Lal Sweet House, not too far from the Kesari Aerated Water Company – ah those pre-Coca Cola days – whose lemonade was much sought after. Anarkali was the main shopping centre – even Atal Behari Vajpayee when he came to Lahore recalled visiting Anarkali as a boy – where the city’s best cloth and apparel store, Dunichand and Sons, was located.

Pran said his earliest memory of Lahore dates back to 1929 when from a balcony he saw the historic Congress procession led by its newly elected president, Jawaharlal Nehru, riding a white horse. Flower petals were being showered on him as the marchers wended their way through Anarkali where they all came to a stop in front of the Bhalla Shoe Store where the proud owner Dhani Ram Bhalla placed a garland of crisp banknotes around Nehru’s neck. As Pran talked, I recalled Nasir Kazmi’s lines: Shehr-e-Lahore, teri raunaqain dayam aabad: Teri galyon ki hawa khainch ke layee mujh ko.

Before I took my leave of Pran Nevile, the unreconstructed son of Lahore, he signed his new book for me, Beyond the Veil, Indian women of the Raj.He was flying to Delhi the next day. When I came home, I opened the book, scribbled across the flyleaf was the inscription, ‘In remembrance of my dearest friend Saeed Ahmed who introduced me to you.’  (Friday Times)







____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
  Khalid Hasan And His Private View  

 

Lahore: a musical story

 

 







____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 

Nur Jehan

 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View 


 

I always found it difficult to imagine a world where there would be no Madam Nur Jehan, but the unthinkable came to pass as the year 2000 was drawing to a close. Nur Jehan is gone and never shall we see her like again, nor hear that voice, though it will live in the music she left us.

 

Born in Kasur on Saturday, 21 September 1926 to Madad Ali and Fateh Bibi, she was named Allah Wasai. She was the youngest in a family of thirteen. They were six sisters, the eldest being Eiden who married lyricist Tanvir Naqvi. Her other sisters were Bibi Gulzar, Ameena Begum, Baharo and Umda “Machine”. This nickname she had earned because of her voice which was so finely honed that people said there was some kind of a machine in this girl’s throat. She had seven brothers named Mian Nawab Din, Gul Muhammad “Gulloo”, Muhammad Hussain, Siddique, Inayat Hussain and Muhammad Shafi. Three of the brothers ended up in mental institutions. Nur Jehan looked after the financial needs of her large family - and even family that was not immediate - all her life. Once she said, “People ask me why I don’t stop working. Well, how can I? If I don’t work, who is going to take care of all these people?” Two of Pakistan movie industry’s younger and highly talented women singers, Azra Jehan and Saira Naseem are her direct family.

 

An entry in Film Stars, a compendium published in Lahore in 1933, says, “She is slim, delicate and beautiful. She has soft black hair and bewitching eyes. She joined Kohinoor United Artists and appeared in some of their films. Later, she was employed by Seven United Artists and played the lead in some of their films opposite Khalil. Later, she joined Sharda Film Co. and has played important roles in several films. She recently appeared in Patit Pawan of Pratima.”

 

She made her first film when she was only four years old.

 

Nur Jehan always preferred her year of birth to remain a romantic mystery. When I first met her in 1967 in Lahore, she told me, “People often wonder how old I am. Let me tell you. In terms of experience of life and men, I have always been a hundred years old.”

 

Her music lives as it has lived from that distant time over sixty years ago when her nightingale voice was first heard in the music halls of Lahore and the smaller town of Punjab. It was an electrifying voice, never false on pitch, never striking an untrue note, but something perfect God had fashioned on a good day. She did not fritter away her gift. She worked hard, unceasingly, devotedly, indefatigably, uncomplaining, all the time honing and polishing this abundance of genius she had been invested with. She worked hard to become great.

 

She was an extraordinary woman who lived on her own terms. She went through good times and bad, marriages, divorces, heartbreaks, casual and serious love affairs, fame, fortune, loneliness and, in the last years of her life, unremitting ill health. She bore it all with quiet confidence and much grace. She never felt sorry for herself, never looked for pity. She was accused of being possessive. It is true that she was because she wanted to hold on to what she had acquired through her own efforts. But she was also very generous. She bore the financial burden of helping her large family through the years. She came to the aid of her second husband Ejaz Durrani, who had treated her badly and left her for the sake of ephemeral sexual conquests, when he lay in a jail in England on a drugs smuggling charge.

 

Shaukat Hussain Rizvi, once her great love, who wrote a scurrilous book about her in which he denigrated her origins, she found harder to forgive. I once asked her if newspaper reports that she had made up with him were true. “True?” she exclaimed. “How can I forgive him after what he did to me?” I said that had happened a long time ago and perhaps it was time to overcome that trauma. “No,” she replied, “He is repentant. He says all he wants is that I forgive him. He weeps and wails and cries. But how can I ever forget how he treated me, what he did to me and to my children?” I said, “I thought you had a soft heart.” “Not for him,” she replied. She said not only him, but she did not like his wife, either. “That woman, Gittho Begum”, she added. That was vintage Nur Jehan. That was how she always referred to the actress Yasmin – who came to the movies as Zarina Reshma – whom Rizvi married after divorcing Nur Jehan. Yasmin was short, hence the name.

 

Soon after her first heart operation, when she returned to Lahore and began to sing again, she said, “This voice is God’s gift and I have preserved it with His grace. In 1992 she told me, “When I stand before the microphone, it is not just me standing there. Behind me, I can feel the presence of my parents. I know they are there. It is a miracle. When I go out, there on the stage during a performance, the voice that you hear is not my speaking voice. Believe me, I do not know where it comes from. It is His gift which He graciously placed in my care. It is His, not mine.”

 

She said after her heart bypass operation that she was not sure she would be able to sing again, but six weeks later, assailed by doubt and greatly apprehensive, she sat down one morning and began to sing. “I sang for forty-five minutes and my voice was good and strong and I was overcome by my gratitude to God. I love my work. When I sing, I feel the presence of God. It is my world, my life, my faith. Only God knows what goes through my heart, how I feel. I can’t express it. My only aim now is to bring happiness to others, to serve the people, to build hospitals, to help my children. I feel that the life God has granted me after my operation is for some special purpose. I want to use this time in the name of the Holy Prophet, whom God bless! That is the way I feel now.”

 

In a conversation with Naveed Riaz in Lahore somewhere in the 1980s, she remembered her early years and spoke about them movingly. “I was only fifteen when I became a mother (actually she was sixteen and a half or seventeen, having married Syed Shaukat Hussain Rizvi in 1943). I did not know anything about children. I thought of myself as a child. I really was too young to understand anything.” Then she spoke about her mother. “After my morning riaz, a teacher would come to help me learn how to read and write. At times, I found that a bit much and so one day, I declared that I was not going to study any more. That was the only time my mother hit me. She struck me just once and said, ‘Nahin, Nooriji, tussi parho gai.’ Now that I think about it, had it not been for her, I would not have learnt to read and write. When I record a song, I have the words in front of me on a sheet of paper. And, by God, every time I look at that sheet of paper, I remember my mother. I feel like raising my hands in prayer to God and ask Him to shower His blessings on my dear mother. You know, so much time has passed, but I can still feel the thrill of riding on my father’s shoulder as he walked through the street. There I am, perched high, looking down on people and shops. O I remember those days!”

 

When Nur Jehan first suffered a heart ailment, I remember saying, “But of course it had to be the heart, considering how many claimants it has had and how often it has fluttered for those on whom she has chosen to smile, even if fleetingly and on a mild summer evening.” We always believed “The Madam” to be indestructible. Her death, therefore, was the kind of loss that it takes a long time to reconcile with. She suffered much pain in her last years. Now at last she is in peace. Once somebody asked her since when she had been singing. “Maybe I was born singing,” she replied.

 

My friend M. Rafiq who lives in London and who has spent the better part of his working life on researching the Indian and Pakistani cinema, starting with the silent era, is without question the greatest authority on Nur Jehan’s career. He has established that Nur Jehan’s family first moved to Lahore from Kasur where her elder sister, Eiden and Haider Bandi (who has been described as her sister but Shaukat Hussain Rizvi says she was a relative), began a stage career. Nur Jehan accompanied them in a song extolling the Holy Prophet of Islam (may peace be upon him) that became a great hit. Its opening line was: Hanste hain sitaaare, ya Shah-e-Madina and it was composed by G.A. Chisti. From there the family moved again, this time to Calcutta, where, it was hoped, the two older girls would be able to break into the movies. This did not quite happen though they continued to appear on the stage. This would be around 1930. She won a part in a silent movie called Hind ke Tare, made by Indian Pictures, Calcutta. Thereafter, the family moved to Bombay where Nur Jehan made another 11 silent films. The silents she made in Bombay in 1931 were: Brave Warrior, Chandramani, Goodbye Kingship, Heart Thief, Jang-e-Daulat, Magic of Love, Necklace, Prithviraj, Shaliwahan and Song of Sorrow. The first Indian talkie, released the same year, was Ardeshir Irani’s Alam Ara.

 

The first Punjabi film Sheila or Pind di Kudi was made in Calcutta in 1936, by which time, Nur Jehan was beginning to be known as a singing actress of some merit. The producer, K.D. Mehra, brought the three sisters over to act and sing in the movie and remembering the popularity of their devotional song in the Punjab some years earlier, he put it in his movie although being in Urdu, it was a bit of a misfit in a Punjabi movie. Apart from this, Nur Jehan was given one number in Punjabi to sing. Her first talkie was Sassi Punnu, made in Bombay in 1932 and her last film in India was Mirza Saahibaan, released in 1947, the year the Raj ended and India and Pakistan became independent countries. In between, she made Aab-e-Hayat, Intiqam, Pattat Pawan, Sha-e-Subhan, all in 1933; Cinema Queen, Kala Waagh or Black Tiger, Ghareeb ka Pyara, Neki ka Taaj, Qismat ki Kuswati, Seeta, Waman Autar or Dani Samraat, Veer Bharat or Sher-e-Hind (1934); Alauddin Doem or Aaj ka Allauddin, Ghar Jamai, Jan Alam Anjuman Ara or Prem Purnima, Kala Sawar, Karwan-e-Husn,  Misr ka Sitrara, Rangeela Nawab, Satri Dharam (1935); Romantic India, Sheela or Pind di Kudi (first Punjabi movie, made in Calcutta), Top ka Gola, Mr and Mrs Bombay (1936); Adrash Mahila, Bismal ki Arzoo, Chabuk Sawar, Fakhr-e-Islam, Jawahar-e-Hind, Parakh, Mr 420, Sarojani, Taran Haar (1937); Brahmachari, Heer Sayal (India’s second Punjabi film, made in Calcutta), Purnima, Royal Commander, Shareef Dakoo, Na Honay Wali Baat or Impossible (1938); Gul Bakauli (India’s third Punjabi movie made in Lahore), Imandaar, Pyam-e-Haq (1939); Sajni, Yamla Jat (Punjabi, made in Lahore) (1940); Chaudhri (Punjabi, made in Lahore), Red Signal, Umeed, Susraal (1941); Chandani, Dheeraj, Faryad, Khandan (made in Lahore) (1942); Duhai, Nadaan, Naukar (1943); Dost, Lal Haveli (1944); Badi Maan, Bhaijan, Gaoon ki Gori, Zeenat (1945); Anmol Gadhi, Dil, Hamjoli, Jadoogar,  Maharana Pratab (1946); and Abida, Jugnu, Mira Bai, Mirza Sahibaan (1947).

 

Nur Jehan sang 127 songs in Indian films and the number of talking films she made from 1932 to 1947 was 69. The number of her silents was 12. Fifty-five of her movies were made in Bombay, eight in Calcutta, five in Lahore and one in Rangoon, Burma.

 

In Pakistan, Nur Jehan made 13 films, starting with Chanway (Punjabi, 1951) and ending with Mirza Ghalib (1961). They were: Chanway (1951), Dupatta (1952), Gulnar (1953), Paatay Khan (1955), Lakht-e-Jigr and Intezaar (1956), Nooraan (1957), Anarkali, Chhoo Mantar (1958), Perdesan, Neend and Koel (1959) and Mirza Ghalib (1961).  Four of the movies were in Punjabi, nine in Urdu.

 

In her interview with Naveed Riaz, she said that she did not like to step out of her home and she had never liked parties. She also preferred to avoid hotels and public gatherings. “I want to lead a simple, uncomplicated life,” she added. Her eldest daughter, Zil-e-Huma, she said, only saw the inside of Shahnur Studio in Lahore after she was married. Her three daughters from her marriage with Ejaz Durrani had never done that even once, she added with a tinge of pride.

 

For a woman who was women’s lib before there was a women’s lib, as we know it today, Nur Jehan was conservative. Her views on women were surprisingly old-fashioned, or perhaps they were cynical. This always surprised me because they came from a woman who had lived her life on her own terms and who owed little to anyone. Although Shaukat Hussain Rizvi claimed in his abusive book on his former wife that it was he who had made Nur Jehan a star, it was not so. Nur Jehan was a star before she met Rizvi. In any case, who could stop a talent as formidable and unique as hers from universal recognition? She said in an interview in 1981, “If a woman works, what does she get  at the end of the day? The only peace she knows is within the four walls of her home. Who can work harder than I have? And what peace, I ask you, have I known? Once the husband realises that his wife can earn more than him, he begins to hate her. He wants her to be dependent on him. Totally. She wants to buy a sweater for herself? He would rather that she begged him for it. That is what happens to women in our country. The men do not want them to be financially independent. Only if a woman is entirely dependent on her husband, can she hope to make a home and have a life.”

 

She once told me, “The moment a man knows that his wife has the ability, the talent or the intelligence to earn money, even a lot of money, he gets insecure, hostile. That is the lot of us women who work. That is what women get in return if they work – contempt and rejection. All men whose wives are successful suffer from feelings of varying inferiority. I think in this country a woman should not earn. It seems to me that she can only have a good marriage if she has nothing.”

 

She narrated with pride how one of her daughters was able to learn French, use a typewriter and ride a horse. “You know what I told her?” she asked. “I said you should think of making a home. What do you want to be? A polo player? A woman’s ultimate fulfilment is her husband, her children and her home. That’s what it’s all about in this society.”

 

She talked once about the stirring songs she sang in 1965, Pakistan’s first war with India. “Let me tell you about those days. No one asked me to sing. I myself phoned Radio Pakistan one morning and said I wanted to come and sing. They did not believe it, just kept asking, ‘Is that Madam Nur Jehan?’ They thought it was some kind of a hoax. Finally, I said, ‘You think I am joking with all these bombs falling, these shells exploding?’ I first had to get a pass to get out of the house because there was a curfew in the city. When I arrived, they were happy and surprised. ‘It really is you,’ they kept saying. ‘Well, you can see for yourself,’ I said. There were no musicians around but I said it did not matter. I had taken four of my own, one of them Mubarak who played the santoor. I set the lyrics to music myself. Merya dhol sipahaya, Mera sohna sheher Kasur ni and Aai puttar hattan te nahin vikday are all my own compositions. It took me literally minutes to compose the tune for Aai puttar. I was accompanied on the tabla by Sabir and the sarangi was played by Nizam sahib. The recording was done by Azam sahib and then there was, of course, Sufi Ghulam Mustafa Tabussum sahib who wrote the words. There were just a few of us, weren’t we!”

 

She continued reminiscing, “I used to load the musicians in my car and off we would go to the Mall where the recordings were done. I would not go home till I was sure everything had gone right. Once as my car moved into the studio, a shell fell, killing the sentry who had just waved me in. It could have been me. I had three little girls at the time, ten, nine and two. They were all ill and there was nobody to look after them. Hina, the eldest, took care of the younger ones although she was a child herself. I used to cook for them at five in the morning and then be on my way. And when the siren sounded, I would push them into the trench we had dug.

 

“My musicians used to tell me to get into the trench when our session was on and the siren sounded. I would tell them, ‘If we have to go, let it be in front of the microphone, singing. Think of the boys who are out there fighting. When I sang Merya dhol sipahaya, it was not pre-recorded. I sang it straight into the microphone and it went live because the tape recorder was not working. It was a very poignant moment for me and I cried a lot. Then I sang. Hassan Latif who was like a brother to me, helped me in those days. He said to me, ‘You have done something very beautiful.’ He gave me a lot of encouragement. He said I was like Umme Kulsum. I have never forgotten his words. They made a deep impression on me.”

 

Rizvi, whom she married after a turbulent love affair in Lahore and Bombay and divorced some years after they came to Pakistan after independence, recalled the first time he had set eyes on her. His account of his life with her Nur Jehan ki Kahani Meri Zubani has not even one nice thing to say about her, including her voice and its undimmed magic despite the passage of time. However, it is only fair that the gist of what he wrote should by recalled here. He wrote that she was no more than eight or nine. This was in Calcutta. He was film editor at a movie studio owned by Rai Bahadur Seth Dalsukh Karnani, a colourful and eccentric character who, despite his years, always had an eye out for a pretty girl, of whom there was hardly a shortage in his world. He would address all men in his Gujarati accent as “shand” or bull, while all women were “devi”, even those he fired from their jobs. Once he asked the manager of the Corinthian Theatre, a man by the name of Naseer, to go to the Punjab and come back with some girls. The man came back with fifteen to twenty of them, among whom were the Nur Jehan sisters, the two older ones Eiden and Haider Bandi, and the eight-year old future queen of the Indian cinema. These girls were collectively called “Punjab  Mail”. One of the girls, Rashida who was related to Nur Jehan, was installed as the Rai Bahadur’s mistress.

 

When Rizvi was asked to come to Lahore to direct Khandan in 1942, Nur Jehan, who with her sisters was in a dance party which performed from town to town, was in Amritsar. He was to choose a heroine for the new movie which was being produced by Dalsukh Pancholi. He recalls that through the help of S.P. Singha, who was vice chancellor of the Punjab University, several girls were sent over for audition but he did hot like any of them. He wanted his heroine to look no more than fifteen or sixteen on the screen, which was how old Nur Jehan was at the time. He decided that it was she whom he wanted. She was sent for but he did not tell her that she was going to play the lead. That was when their affair began which ended in marriage against the wishes of her brothers who did not wish to lose her. She was the soul and the main draw of the roving dance party.

 

One day, during the shooting, Rizvi said to Nur Jehan by way of a joke, “What sort of oil do you use on your hair? It smells awful.” He says the moment the words left his mouth, she burst out crying and just would not stop. “What sort of a woman is this!” he recalled saying to himself. “I should have been warned that she was a very dangerous woman but I was in love. I could not see that.” As a result of this incident, the shooting remained interrupted for five or six days. When it was resumed, he says he came back, fully determined that he would ignore her. However, after some cajoling from the Pancholi clan of nephews that hung around the studio, Rizvi made up with her. The love affair was resumed. One day, old Pancholi sent for him and said, “Look Shaukat, my nephews are your friends and I treat you as one of them. Let me give you some advice. Let this remain a little game between the two of you, no more than that. Don’t let it go too far.” He wrote, “To this day, his words ring in my ears. But I was blinded by love.”

 

In Rizvi’s words, “She was having this affair with me on the one hand, while carrying on with some others on the side. One day, I ran into a friend on the Mall (in Lahore) who said there was someone looking for me.” He was led to a house off the Mall where he was surprised to meet Nur Jehan. But she was not alone. In her wake came Hassan Amin (more about him a little later). It seems they were having a playful pillow fight. “I was taken aback,” wrote Rizvi, “Here was the woman who used to assure me of her love … I asked Hasan Amin what it all meant. He replied that it was Nur Jehan’s idea. She it was who wanted him to send for me. The idea was to make me jealous.” Her family, he adds, was in on the little game, although Amin knew that she was having an affair with Rizvi.

 

            Hasan Amin, I should add by way of a footnote, told me himself that Nur Jehan was his first love. He was a student at Government College, Lahore, when he first saw her, performing with her sisters on the stage. He was smitten. He chased her all the way to Kasur and despite the opposition of her family, Nur Jehan had an affair with him. Last time I met Hasan Amin was at his home in Islamabad in the late summer of 1999 when he told me of his life-long infatuation with Nur Jehan. Earlier that day, there had been a rumour that Nur Jehan had died in Karachi. Hasan Amin said he would phone her which he did. He kept saying to her, ‘Nuri, please forgive me, Nuri, please forgive me.” When I told him to give her my best, he said to her that there was someone with him who wanted him to give her his best. When he told her who it was, she said I was an “old and special friend.” We were thrilled that she was alive, though she was by no means well. I said to Hasan Amin, “We have got to celebrate this.” “Then we will celebrate it with champagne,” he said grandly. “Champagne in Islamabad?” I asked. “Yes, indeed, champagne in Islamabad,” he replied. He did indeed produce a bottle of fine French champagne with which we toasted Madam’s health. I also asked him why he was asking her to forgive him. “She wanted me to marry her, but all wanted to do in those days was play cricket,” he said wistfully.

 

            But returning to Shaukat Hussain Rizvi’s story, Nur Jehan promised to drop all others and the affair revived. Some time later, she began to come to him with stories of her mistreatment by her family, including beatings by her brothers. Rizvi told her to make a declaration to that effect (before a judge) but she did not do that. Meanwhile, their affair became even more torrid. Khandan was now near completion. One day when the studio car went to fetch her from Hira Mandi, Lahore’s famous flesh district (where she was obviously staying), there was word waiting that the family had left. Police warrants were issued, Seth Dalsukh Pancholi being a man of influence, and forty members of her family were arrested from Kasur and brought to Lahore. That day the scene to be shot included the actors Ghulam Muhammad, Pran, the hero, and Nur Jehan. Her elder brother tried to make a protest to Rizvi who told him to be on his way. Nur Jehan, once again, began to cry complaining about her treatment by the family. He told her to go before a judge, tell him the truth and declare that she wanted to marry Shaukat Hussain Rizvi. She promised to do so the next day. The police case against her family was also to be heard the next day. Her brother Shafi told the judge that the family was afraid Rizvi would abduct Nur Jehan. When this was put to her by the judge, she said that to her Shaukat Hussain Rizvi was like a “brother”. This, Rizvi wrote, was typical of her, adding that he could narrate not one but “two thousand five hundred” such stories.

 

            Khandan was released and it was an immediate hit. Shaukat went home to see his parents in U.P. When he returned to Lahore, there were several messages from Nur Jehan waiting. She was in Amritsar with her dance party doing shows at the Rialto Cinema. Rizvi finally relented, travelled to Amritsar with friends and when he met her, she told him the same story. She explained that she had been forced to make the “brother” statement in Lahore because of pressure from her brothers. However, this time, she assured him she was willing to go with him. He told her that he would send for the police which would take her to court where she should make the necessary declaration, but wrote Rizvi, “she again cheated me. The fact was that she did exactly what her brothers told her to do.”

 

He returned to Lahore and from there he took off for Bombay where he was assigned by V.M. Vyas to produce the movie Naukar. Nur Jehan had also arrived in Bombay and wanted to be cast as the lead. However, Rizvi refused and, when pressed, agreed to make her the “side heroine” but he made it clear to Vyas that he did not wish to speak to her. According to Rizvi, one day Nur Jehan’s brother Shafi came to him, asked for forgiveness and said, “Baby (he called her Baby) is not herself, please forgive her.” Then he stepped out, brought in Nur Jehan, who was waiting outside and left her there. Nur Jehan told him how cruelly she had been treated. She showed him marks on her body resulting from beatings given to her by her brothers. The two made up and, before long, they were married. However, more trouble was afoot. Nur Jehan’s parents filed a suit against Rizvi charging abduction of their daughter. Rizvi sent for her birth certificate from Kasur (reproduced in the book) which listed Nur Jehan’s parents’s profession as ‘tawaif’ or prostitute. The same document gave her date of birth as 21 September 1926.

 

            Rizvi’s and Nur Jehan’s first two children, Akbar and Asghar, were born in Bombay. Their married life appears to have been fairly normal and Rizvi does not mention any wayward behaviour by his wife, except one incident involving her meeting her old flame Hasan Amin who visited her in Bombay. After Khandan, Nur Jehan’s career soared and she made several movies. The family left Bombay, such being the atmosphere at the time, and settled in Karachi where Rizvi bought a house in Garden East. Rizvi wrote that he had decided to change his profession and was interested in buying what became the Hyesons factory manufacturing light bulbs. Nur Jehan, however, insisted that he should only follow a line of work of which he had experience and for which he was qualified. This was sound advice, although Rizvi’s account gives her no credit. They moved to Lahore where Rizvi bought the abandoned Shorey Studio which he turned into Shahnur. Rizvi wrote that while he would go to work, she would have it off with Ajay Kumar, the male lead in her second movie in Pakistan Dupatta.

 

            Her romance with Pakistan’s debonair opening batsman Nazar Muhammad began during the filming of Chanway, according to Rizvi. Nazar who was related to music director Feroz Nizami, would come to Shahnur where the movie was being made. He could carry a tune and he obviously had an eye out for her, as she had for him. According to Rizvi, it was she who encouraged Nazar. Their affair continued even after Chanway was completed. During the 1953 martial law in Lahore after the outbreak of the anti-Ahmediyya riots, Rizvi charges that Nur Jehan who had a curfew pass, would put on a white burqa and go to Hira Mandi to meet Nazar. Rizvi’s informers told him of these secret assignations and one day, he followed her without her knowledge and found that what he had been told was true. Whenever he would ask her about Nazar, she would say that to her he was like Akbar or Asghar. However, the scandal became so embarrassing that Rizvi decided to act. One day, his driver Amir Hasan reported to him that he had just dropped Nur Jehan at Islamia Park where Nazar and she had a place of assignation. Rizvi, along with two carloads of friends and helpers, arrived at the house that had been identified by the driver. It belonged to an old man who sold amulets and traditional medicines. Rizvi knocked at the door – his men had surrounded the place – and when it was answered, demanded to know if Nur Jehan was in there.

 

            The old man pretended that he did not know who Nur Jehan was. The enraged Rizvi, brushing him aside, began to climb the stairs to the upper floor that had only one room. The old man started to shout and scream so that the lovers should be warned of the raid. Rizvi says he saw the two of them lying in bed. Had he had a gun, he adds, he would have shot them both. Nazar jumped out of bed and leapt out of the window to the ground, twenty-five feet below, falling on his arm which broke. Rizvi’s helpers caught him nevertheless. Nur Jehan, meanwhile, began to cry, an art, Rizvi says, of which she is a past master. She came down and began to scream that it was her husband who was passing her on to other men. She made such a racket that people from the neighbouring houses came out. Before long, there were about two hundred people there. Nazar had meanwhile lost consciousness. Mian Ehsan of Crescent Films also arrived on the scene and took Nur Jehan away. Nazar never played cricket again. It was one of the greatest tragedies to hit Pakistan’s cricket.

 

            Rizvi accuses her of affair after affair. According to him she had an affair with the hero of her first film, Anwar Jahangir Khan and cinematographer Raza Mir. Also M. Naseem, owner of the film distribution company, Popular Pictures, Royal Park, Lahore. He was often referred to as Naseem Popularwala. The last affair she certainly had and it lasted quite a few years. Six of her letters to Naseem written from Tashkent are reproduced in Rizvi’s book. These letters date back to August 1958 when her marriage to Rizvi was practically over. She asks him in both letters to look after the two boys, Akbar and Asghar and the little girl Zil-e-Huma. Nur Jehan was in Tashkent on a Pakistan movie industry delegation. The six letters are signed “Your own Nur Jehan” and “Your Nur Jehan” and “Your Nur”. The letters, Shaukat claimed, were given to him by Naseem himself. What a rat! On such people, she wasted her affections.

 

            Rizvi wrote that Nur Jehan also had an affair with movie director Anwar Kamal Pasha who once gave her some brandy to drink and when it hit her, she tore off her shirt. He also accused her of having a casual affair with the brother of a studio employee by the name of Gul Zaman. She asked him to press her feet one day and led him on. Once she was through with him, she told him to get lost. She also tried to have an affair with the actor Santosh Kumar who said he respected Rizvi like his father and would prefer death to having an affair with her. She told him, according to Santosh, in English, “I love you and I love others.” She also had an affair, claimed Shaukat, with music director Nazir Ali. She also had a one-night stand, charged Rizvi, with a crockery merchant in Dhani Ram Road, Lahore, as well as the actor Mazhar Shah. She also had a serious affair with actor Yusuf Khan and a PIA pilot by the name of Ijaz Alam. Rizvi also accused her of practising black art and preparing some potion based on owl flesh which put those to whom it was administered under her power.

 

            I have provided the gist of Rizvi’s diatribe against Nur Jehan in some detail because Saeed Malik, the musicologist, whose opinion I respect and who knew Rizvi well, said to me once that I had been too harsh on Rizvi in the various pieces I had written on Nur Jehan. He said what Rizvi had written or said about Nur Jehan also deserved to be taken into account. I am not endorsing what Rizvi wrote or said - much of it maybe and, probably, is true - but that does not take away from Nur Jehan her greatness. She was an extraordinary woman and it would be unfair to judge her from ordinary standards. She may have done some or all of the things that Rizvi accuses her of, but, in so doing, he betrayed his own arrogance and self-love. There is not one single word he has to say in acknowledgment of her exceptional talent. In fact, he argued that it was he who taught her how to converse, how to act, how to behave socially. However, according to him, she remained faithful to her “origins.” Both Rizvi and Nur Jehan are dead, so if they are still fighting, they can slug it out in the hereafter.

 

Rizvi's account is unrelieved by humour or the intense love he had felt for her once. It was a little late in the day for him to regret having fallen for the fledgling enchantress from Kasur with a voice like molten silver. In his memoir, from which I have quoted extensively, he repeatedly expresses regret at having married her when he could have married a high-born girl from a nawab or jagirdar family. Perhaps, but he will ultimately be remembered more for having been once her husband than for his own work. Rizvi and Nur Jehan were married when she was barely sixteen. There is no question that he was besotted with the pubescent, flirtatious girl whose musical talent was prodigious and whose ambition to succeed was as vast as the Punjabi countryside she had sprung from. 

 

Rizvi's book is made up of a string of allegations against the woman who was to bear him three children: Akbar, Asghar and Zil-e-Huma. He felt no compunction in berating Nur Jehan's name and reputation, whining that she had betrayed him time after time. Men, he wrote, were in and out of her life almost from the day they were married. He tries to portray himself as the long-suffering husband who bore the infidelities of his wife with stoic heroism. What he does not say is that he was no angel himself and that there were more women in his life than he has had the courage to admit.  He says he continued the marriage "for the children’s sake", an argument that lacks credibility. If the marriage was as bad as he said it was and Nur Jehan was such an awful, uncaring mother, then it would have been better for the children had it ended. Long after she had left him, he complained that she had turned his sons against him. “They are after my blood,” he said.

 

Those who knew Nur Jehan will stand witness to the great love she always bore her children. Akbar, in particular, she always doted on. He was her weakness and could make her do anything.  In Rizvi's small-minded and partisan account of their life together, not once did he acknowledge Nur Jehan's musical genius. She was an extraordinary woman whose virtues and failings by the very nature of her greatness remained extraordinary. Women like Nur Jehan cannot be judged by standards applicable to lesser human beings. She may have been avaricious, insecure and possessive but she was always capable of great generosity. All her life, she took care of her family, never forgetting her less than fortunate beginnings. Nur Jehan led her life with great self-confidence and much grace. What is more, in a man's world, she did so on her own terms. I once asked her why she was sometimes accused of being insensitive to her admirers. “I am invited to someone's home, say for dinner, and after everyone has eaten, I am asked if I would sing a song. And I say I won't because I have come to dine not to sing. If I said yes, it would be unprofessional. I have tried to maintain the grace and dignity of my profession.”

 

While emphasising his high-caste Syed origins most immodestly (are the Syeds the Brahmins of the Muslims?), and extolling his lineage, grooming, upbringing, good looks, and general culture, including his pure “ahl-e-zubaan” Urdu accent with the correctly intoned “sheen and qaaf”, Rizvi made cruel fun of Nur Jehan’s background and family, constantly downgrading her because he was a “kanjar”. He felt no compunction in saying that Nur Jehan came from the gutter and while accusing her of greed and dishonesty, he showed little generosity of spirit himself. He even held her responsible for the collapse of her first-born son Akbar’s marriage. He also mocked her for having brothers who had to be sent off to the mental asylum. Once, he wrote, Nur Jehan had said to him that she would have her revenge by seeing to it that his daughter Zil-e-Huma returned to Hira Mandi. Outside her door, she would place a sign: Zil-e-Huma daughter of Syed Shaukat Hussain Rizvi.  

 

It was typical of the nasty, small-minded and partisan nature of Rizvi’s account of their life together that not once did he acknowledge Nur Jehan as an artist. There is no question that Nur Jehan was an extraordinary woman and so her virtues and failings must, by the same measure, remain extraordinary. Perhaps the narrative tells us more about Rizvi than it does about Nur Jehan. As for myself, I am concerned with the Nur Jehan I admired all my life with all her faults and failings and all her glorious attributes, not least her music and the professionalism that she brought to her work. She demanded respect and she got it. You could not make one slighting remark about Nur Jehan in the movie industry and get away with it. Madam’s network of spies was extensive and their loyalty to her was legendary. When I first met that superb music director Hassan Latif (Lat uljhi suljha ja re balam, meray hathoon mein mehndi laggi and Ja apni hasratoon pay aansoo baha ke sau ja) at her Gulberg Home in 1969 (now demolished), she introduced him by saying, “He is my gang.”

 

Madam's liaisons were part of her legend. Did someone ever directly ask her about them? One person whom I can name who did indeed ask her was Raja Tajammul Hussain. “All half truths,” she had told him. “Then let's have some half truths,” he ventured, “the serious half truths, that is.” She was in one of her throwaway moods and she said, “All right then,” and began to pull out names from her photographic memory. After a few minutes, she asked Tajammul, “And how many do you have?” “Sixteen so far,” Tajammul replied with a straight face. Her response in Punjabi remains a Nur Jehan classic. “Hai Allah! Na na kardian wi solan ho gai nain!” 

 

She told Hussain Haqqani, who saw a great deal of her in her last days because she said she found his company entertaining, when he asked her about her fabled love life. “Husn parast mein hoon magar budkirdar nahin.” Or, beauty I admire, but a loose woman I am not. She one day said to him, “I should have met you when I was young, but I have met you when I am old, so I can only make you my son.” One day he asked her what regrets she had in life. “Two,” she answered. “I could not get an education and I was not able to make a home.” She always urged her three daughters from her marriage to Ijaz --Hina, Shazia and Nazia – that true happiness for a woman lay in a good marriage. She was unhappy about her youngest daughter Nazia’s crush on the actor Shan of whom she did not think much, nor was she much enamoured of his mother, the actress Neelo, who became the toast of Pakistan with the release of the movie Saat Lakh in which she danced to the runaway hit Tu chutti lai ke aaja baalama. Hina, the eldest daughter out of her marriage to Ijaz, had a good voice but Nur Jehan did not want her to follow in her footsteps. Once she told Haqqani, “What is the point really! She will never be able to become Nur Jehan.”






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.

Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
 
Khalid Hasan And His Private View 








____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
 
Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
 
Indian cinema’s tragic beauty
Khalid Hasan
TFT

(This article first appared at Asiapeace Yahoo Group)
----------------------------------
"Dilip Kumar and Madhubala were in love. It is said he asked her to drop
everything and just come with him, but she wanted her father’s permission
which, of course, was refused. Later, Dilip, to his eternal shame, appeared
as a witness against her in a bitter court battle. That broke her heart "
----------------------------------


The movie industry in the subcontinent is over eighty years old. Were
someone to set about finding who among the thousands of women who have
passed across this shimmering dreamland was the most stunning, the most
beautiful, there would be little difference of opinion about that woman
being Mumtaz Begum, whom the world knew by her screen name of Madhubala.

Like that contemporary of hers Marilyn Monroe, she died young, nine days
after her thirty-seventh birthday. The two most important men in her life,
as in the life of Marilyn, only brought her immense pain, though they must
have loved her, each in his own fashion. The first was her father, the
authoritarian, hard-driving Ataullah Khan who in his frenzied bid to
control her life and career does not seem to have paid much attention to
the heart condition with which she was born and which killed her. She was
the toast of India and Pakistan and wherever else movies made in Bombay
were seen, but she was like a prisoner in her own home. She was not allowed
to meet people, unless they were pre-cleared by her father, nor was she
permitted in any sense to be a part of the industry to which her whole life
was dedicated. She was a child star, her first film being the great
box-office success of pre-Independence days, Basant, starring Ashok Kumar
and Mumtaz Shanti.

Mumtaz Shanti, I may add, died unknown and unsung in Pakistan about ten
years ago. The woman celebrated for her sensational dancing and
considerable acting talent who once guaranteed the success of any movie
that she was associated with, passed away without any notice having been
taken of her death by those among whom she lived, in what can only be
called dignified poverty.

But to return to Madhubala, the other man in Madhubala’s life who let her
down was Dilip Kumar. They were in love and once it is said he asked her to
drop everything and just come with him, but she wanted her father’s
permission which, of course, was refused. Later, Dilip Kumar, to his
eternal shame, appeared as a witness against her in a bitter court battle.
That broke her heart.

Madhubala has been brought back to life through a biography published in
India, which has now appeared in Pakistan in translation. The book was
written by Khadija Akbar who teaches English at the Osmania University,
Hyderabad, India. It is based on several years of research and interviews
with some of the star’s contemporaries like Dilip Kumar, Dev Anand, Shammi
Kapoor, and the music directors Naushad and Anil Biswas (who died in Delhi
recently). The Urdu version – Rah-e-Dil ki Musafir – brought out by
Bookage, Lahore, bears Zeba Nasreen, the translator’s name both on the
cover and the spine. Those who do not look at the inside flap will believe
Ms Nasreen to be the author. She has even had the temerity to dedicate a
work which is not hers to her “ ammi”. It is yet another instance of the
dishonesty and illegality that characterises, barring some honourable
exceptions, much of the publishing world in Pakistan. The translation,
there can be little doubt, is also unauthorised, but it is not bad so I am
not looking this particular gift horse in the mouth to count its teeth.

Madhubala’s beauty was legendary. The film star Nadira, whom Mahbub Khan
introduced in the first Indian colour film Aan, said of her, “She was like
a fairy descended from the skies. There was such dignity to her beauty,
which was what placed her in a class distinct and apart from others who
bear good looks.” Begum Para who used to take morning walks with her said,
“If you saw her face the first thing in the morning as the sun rose, your
felt happy for the entire day. She was like a dream of exceeding
loveliness.” Nimmi recalled that when she first saw Madhubala on a movie
set, she could not sleep that night. She just kept wondering if what she
had seen was real or if it was an illusion or perhaps it was an angel come
to earth.

Madhubala came to the movies as a child star and she kept working till the
end, bearing on her shoulders the entire financial burden of family
support. Her father, who kept hawk-like control on her life, also put her
money into wasteful ventures, including an unfinished screen disaster
called Pathan which he directed and which sank without trace. Madhubala by
then was too sick to star in it. He had earlier squandered her money by
launching five other movies that were never completed. He was such a tyrant
that he did not permit her to attend a dinner arranged during a film
festival where Frank Capra was present because he said, “She does not know
how to eat with a knife and fork.” It is hard to imagine that this
heartthrob of millions was a defenceless young woman tyrannised over by a
harsh father.

Madhubala was in love with Dilip Kumar, and he with her, but Ataullah Khan
stood like a wall in their way. He did not want her to get married because
he would have thereby lost all the money that she earned. When the two,
Dilip and Madhubala, were cast for the movie Naya Daur, Ataullah Khan laid
down the condition that his daughter would not go for outdoor shooting. He
had earlier decreed that she would not do night shooting. The director of
Naya Daur, B.R. Chopra, wanted the unit to travel to Bhopal, but Ataullah
Khan put his foot down and even said that the entire thing was a ruse to
give Dilip the opportunity to entice away his daughter. Finally, in
desperation, Chopra sued Madhubala for fraudulently obtaining an advance
from him for a project she had no intention of completing. He also sacked
Madhubala and brought in the South Indian bombshell Vijayntimala to replace
her.

The litigation was nasty and Dilip Kumar appeared as a witness for the
prosecution against Madhubala and said some very bitter things about her in
open court. While Dilip was testifying against her, she turned to her
lawyer R.D. Chadha and said, “I don’t believe this is the man who was so in
love with me and whom I loved more than anyone and anything in the world.”
The film Naya Daur was released while the case was still in court and it
was an instant hit, including the music scored by O.P. Nayyar. Feeling
triumphant, Chopra withdrew the case.

Madhubala made one last attempt to reach out to Dilip. She asked their
mutual friend, the movie journalist Bunny Robin, to go to Dilip and tell
him how despite the court case, she still loved him. The moment Robin
mentioned why he was there, Dilip jumped at him angrily. “What rubbish.
What love?!” He was not even prepared to hear her name. Feeling lost and
rejected, Madhubala once and for he only time in her life defied her father
and married Kishore Kumar. It was a disastrous marriage and it never worked.

Nature had given her unparalleled beauty; but it had also left a hole in
her heart which in the 1960s was considered a condition that could not be
repaired. Ironically, the hole that Dilip, the only man she ever loved,
left in her heart, was even bigger and perhaps what brought the short and
tragic life of this lovely woman to an early end was not what nature had
wrought but what the man she loved had done. She lies in the Santa Cruz
graveyard in Bombay, where among others, lies Muhammad Rafi and even
Ataullah Khan who can no longer tyrannise over her. She rests in peace at
last, still mourned by many.

– This is a regular column by TFT’s Washington correspondent






____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Reply with quote Download Post
Post Re: Khalid Hasan And His Private View 
 
 

Khalid Hasan And His Private View 

 

 

Sunday, June 10, 2007

lahore lahore aye: Remembering Amanat Ali Khan

By A Hamid
Translated from Urdu by Khalid Hasan

In the Lahore radio station’s smaller studio, the one that lay to the left of the main entrance, there used to stand a grand piano, which was used by musicians for their compositions and rehearsals. One day, as I was walking past that studio, I heard Amanat Ali Khan’s voice. Gently, I opened the door and found him playing the piano and singing. A half-smoked cigarette rested on top of the piano. When he saw me, he stopped. “I have just set one of the ghazals of Aatish to music. I want you to hear it,” he said. Then he picked up his cigarette, inhaled deeply and began to sing.



I first met Amanat in the early days after independence. He had moved to Lahore from Patiala with his entire family. He was handsome and was always a natty dresser, with a superb taste in literature. Although he knew most of the city’s writers and poets, he seldom came to the Pak Tea House, their hangout, preferring the Cheney’s Lunch Home next door. One day Amanat and I were walking towards Bhati Gate from the Pak Tea House, when he said to me, “Here is a composition by Sajjad that I am going to hum. Anyone who can render it as composed can claim a thousand rupees from me.” And it is true that no music director has been quite able to compose more intricate tunes. Madam Noor Jahan once said that Sajjad simply did not know how to create a simple composition. His scores for the movies Sangdil and Halchal are classics.



As one enters Bhati Gate, in a street to the left stood the house where Amanat’s family first found shelter after partition. I remember sitting there with Amanat, his brother Fateh Ali Khan and their father, Akhtar Hussain Khan, who showed me a small round box in which family jewels brought from Patiala were kept. These precious stones were gifts from the Maharaja to his court singers. Akhtar Hussain Khan was a very handsome man with blue eyes. As we sat there, a little boy brought a betel leaf for Amanat. Before he could put it in his mouth, Fateh said something to him in a language I could not understand. Then he examined the betel leaf his brother held in his hand with great care before indicating that it was alright to eat it. I asked Fateh what language he had spoken because I was unfamiliar with it. He smiled. “This is a secret language we have invented. I told Amanat to make sure that there is no antimony in the betel leaf, which if swallowed, can destroy your voice.” Later, other musicians at Radio Pakistan confirmed to me what antimony could do to the human voice. The secret language was actually simple. All you had to do was to place the first letter of the word you were going to utter at the end.



My memory takes me back to the day Amanat and I were sitting in a Government College hostel room where a Montgomery student named Mahmood lives. Amanat is dusting an old harmonium with his handkerchief. The instrument is untuned, but that does not deter Amanat from unravelling a raag in that beautiful voice of his. He loved the raag Jai Jai Vanti and he used to say that there were nights when he was able to physically invoke the presiding goddess of that divine raag. He was a pure classical singer, but the first ghazal he sang established him as a master of that genre. Had he not sung that haunting Ibne Insha ghazal – Insha ji uthho ab kooch karo – iss sheher mein jee ka lagana kya – the present generation may have remained unaware of the man who wrote it.



On the road that leads from the Paani wala Talab to the Lahore Fort, there was a house whose doors and windows had been lost to fire in the 1947 upheaval. I remember the evening with Amanat and I sitting on the open roof of this house under the stars, drinking. When I left to walk back home, instead of going towards Bhati Gate, I began to walk towards Badami Bagh. Had Fateh Ali Khan not told me to turn around, God knows where I might have ended up in that dark night.



When Maulana Kausar Niazi became Bhutto’s minister of information, Kishwar Naheed arranged a musical event for him at the Bureau of National Reconstruction on The Mall. Amanat, who had been asked to sing one of the Maulana’s ghazals, always liked to take a quick swig or two of the stuff before a performance. I was in Kishwar Naheed’s room with some of the other guests waiting for the event to begin, when Amanat motioned to me from outside to have a word with him. “What I badly need is a glass; just get one and come to the bathroom where I will wait,” he said. I returned to Kishwar’s office and picked up a glass that lay on a side table, slipped it into my pocket and walked out, with Kishwar looking at me with much suspicion. Amanat, in the meanwhile, had given up on me and done the necessary straight from the bottle.



In the beginning, drinking was just an occasional pastime with Amanat, but it soon became his need and in his last years, he would keep drinking during the day as well. By then, he did not care what he was drinking, good stuff or bad. Like Manto, his drinking had turned into alcoholism, and it cost him his health and sent him to an early grave. My last meeting with Amanat took place in the room of a Radio Pakistan woman producer. It was a very cold day and that once-handsome young man was now physically ravaged and alcohol-dependent. He had also lost one of his front teeth. “Why are you here on so cold a morning?” I asked him. “I am here for a do which begins at ten and for which I have to present a Kausar Niazi ghazal, which is still to be set to music.” This meeting made me very sad. A few days later he left for Karachi and one morning I learnt that he was dead. He was buried in a graveyard off McLeod Road with people crying as they lowered him into the grave.



A sweeter voice than Amanat Ali Khan’s we are privileged to hear but once in a blue moon. A good deal of what he left us is preserved in recordings and every time I hear him, tears well up in my eyes.



A Hamid, distinguished Urdu novelist and short story writer, writes a column every week based on his memories of old Lahore. Translated from Urdu by Khalid Hasan

 







____________
"I am a dreamer,I collect all the smiles from My yesterday,
Neatly pack them into words and hide them in my heart,
I call them "MEMORIES" Music has no boundary.
Offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic Thank Post  Page 1 of 1

Users browsing this topic: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None